Evansville sheet metal works inc.
Gill v evansville sheet metal works.
Summary judgment is improper if the moving party fails to carry its burden but if it succeeds then the non moving party must come forward with evidence establishing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact.
Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 637 ind.
Evansville sheet metal works inc 940 n e 2d 328 330 ind.
Citing to older indiana cases the court stated.
Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 2012 wl 2384095 ind 2011 table thereby vacating the opinion of the court of appeals ind.
60 years of experience the latest in laser waterjet and other cnc cutting technologies make esmw your best choice for custom metal fabrication.
Brownsburg 963 n e 2d 453 457 ind.
Gill appealed the trial court s ruling that the csor barred her contractor negligence claim and the court of appeals affirmed.
Evansville sheet metal works inc.
June 25 2012 docket number.
Esmw motion for summary judgment with respect to sharon s complaint that gale had been exposed to asbestos and.
Esmw allegedly worked as a contractor for al coa at a common work site with gale gill where materials containing asbestos were present and or used appellant s app.
Appellant plaintiff sharon gill sharon on her own behalf and on behalf of the estate of her husband gale gill gale appeals the trial court s grant of appellee defendant s evansville sheet metal works inc.
Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 637 n 4 ind.
49s05 1111 cv 672 justia opinion summary.
It has long been settled that a preemption analysis begins with the presumption that.
Plaintiff claimed that her husband s death was caused by defendant s negligence in installing or removing asbestos containing materials and brought product liability and contractor negligence claims against defendant.
Gill sought and we granted transfer gill v.
Evansville sheet metal works inc 970 n e 2d 633 637 ind.
Summary judgment is improper if the movant fails to carry its burden but if it succeeds then the nonmoving party must come forward with evidence establishing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact.
Standard principles of federal preemption guide this analysis.